用户登录
期刊信息
  • 主管单位:
  • 上海市教育委员会
  • 主办单位:
  • 上海理工大学、上海市能源研究会、上海电气(集团)总公司
  • 主  编:
  • 陈康民
  • 地  址:
  • 上海市军工路516号
  • 邮政编码:
  • 200093
  • 联系电话:
  • 021-55272843
  • 电子邮件:
  • eribjb@usst.edu.cn
  • 国际标准刊号:
  • 1008-8857
  • 国内统一刊号:
  • 31-1410/TK
  • 邮发代号:
  • 单    价:
  • 5.00
  • 定    价:
  • 20.00
四类螺旋翅片管束热力特性数值研究
Numerical study on thermal-hydraulic characteristics of four types of helical finned tube banks
投稿时间:2017-08-02  
DOI:10.13259/j.cnki.eri.2019.02.010
中文关键词:  锅炉  螺旋翅片管  换热  阻力
英文关键词:boiler  helical finned tube  heat transfer  pressure drop
基金项目:
作者单位
马有福 上海理工大学 能源与动力工程学院, 上海 200093 
蔡振琦 上海理工大学 能源与动力工程学院, 上海 200093 
徐翔 中国石油新疆独山子石化公司, 克拉玛依 838600 
袁益超 上海理工大学 能源与动力工程学院, 上海 200093 
王治云 上海理工大学 能源与动力工程学院, 上海 200093 
黄燕 西南交通大学 机械工程学院, 成都 610031 
摘要点击次数: 3066
全文下载次数: 3079
中文摘要:
      对气流横掠螺旋翅片管错列管束的流动与换热特性进行了数值研究,在雷诺数Re = 10 000~40 000范围比较了四类(连续型、平齿I型、平齿L型和扭齿型)螺旋翅片管束的换热、阻力及热力综合性能。结果表明:与常规的连续型管束相比,在相同Re下,平齿I型、平齿L型和扭齿型管束的努塞尔数Nu分别提高约24%、32%和38%,欧拉数Eu分别增大约24%、85%和90%;在相同的换热量、流体输运功耗和翅片管结构参数下,平齿I型、平齿L型和扭齿型管束所需的换热面积较之连续型管束所需的分别减小约9%、6%和12%,扭齿型表现最佳;在管束紧凑性方面,连续型、平齿I型和扭齿型管束无明显差别,但选用平齿L型会使管束体积相对增大约18%。
英文摘要:
      A numerical study on the flow and heat transfer characteristics of helical finned tube bank with staggered layouts was performed. The comparison of heat transfer, pressure drop and overall thermal-hydraulic performance among four types of fin structures such as solid-fin, I-foot serrated-fin, L-foot serrated-fin and twisted-fin was conducted in Reynolds number Re range of 10 000~40 000. The results showed that comparing with the solid-fin tube bank under the same Re, Nusselt numbers of I-foot serrated-fin, L-foot serrated-fin and twisted-fin tube banks increased by approximately 24%, 32% and 38%, respectively. Meanwhile, their Euler numbers augmented by approximately 24%, 85% and 90%, respectively. Under the same heat duty, power consumption for fluid transportation, and structure parameters of finned tube banks, the heat transfer areas of I-foot serrated-fin, L-foot serrated-fin and twisted-fin tube banks decreased by approximately 9%, 6% and 12%, respectively, meaning that the twisted-fin tube bank had the best performance of saving heat transfer area. Regarding the compactness of tube banks, there was no difference among the solid-fin, I-foot serrated-fin and twisted-fin tube banks, while the spatial volume of the L-foot serrated-fin tube bank enlarged by 18% in comparison with the other tube banks.
HTML   查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭