2. 上海理工大学 能源与动力工程学院,上海 200093
2. School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
我国从2019年开始推行垃圾强制分类后,厨余垃圾分出量急剧增加。2021年,厨余垃圾分出量达1.27亿t[1]。厌氧消化因有机负荷高、占地少、周期短、环境影响小等优点,逐渐成为厨余垃圾的主要处理方式[2]。但厌氧消化通常会产生20% ~ 47%(质量分数)的沼渣(AD),其主要由矿物质、微生物、碳水化合物、脂质和蛋白质组成[3]。沼渣水分和灰分含量高[4],热值低,燃烧特性差,燃烧过程中易结渣[5]。目前,沼渣可与生活垃圾进行掺烧处置[6]。
随着互联网和电子商务的快速发展,快递服务业每年增长速度超过20%[7],同时产生了大量的快递物流垃圾。据统计,2022年快递物流垃圾产生量达到2 000万t[8],其中瓦楞纸板(CB)(简称纸板)和塑料袋是其主要成分,质量分数分别为46.5%和30.4%,而塑料包装以聚乙烯(PE)为主[9]。大约质量分数为80% ~ 90%的纸板和2%的塑料包装被回收再利用,剩余部分则与城市生活垃圾掺烧或进入垃圾填埋场[9]。一般而言,PE热值高,受热易熔融,从而影响燃烧设备的稳定和安全运行[10]。
因减容减量效果显著、污染物控制技术成熟,焚烧是城市有机固废的有效处置手段[1, 11]。研究表明混合燃烧是改善燃料燃烧特性的有效途径[5, 12–13]。聚丙烯通过促进脱挥发分改善了生物质综合燃烧特性,并降低了燃烧反应活化能[14]。聚丙烯和聚乙烯通过强化着火和燃尽可改善印染污泥的燃烧特性[15]。同时,污水污泥中Fe和Ca组分可以抑制煤燃烧过程中NOx释放[16],尤其在污水污泥和玉米秸秆混合燃烧的脱挥发分阶段具有强烈的协同效应,从而降低40%(体积分数)的NO排放[17]。而且,污水污泥中含Ca组分在与水煤浆混合燃烧过程中还可以有效降低SO2排放[18]。然而,由于沼渣、纸板和聚乙烯理化特性差异大,燃烧过程中污染物排放特性不同。因此,有必要研究燃烧温度、纸板和聚乙烯质量分数对混合燃烧过程中HCl、NOx和SO2等气态污染物排放规律的影响,为清洁、高效、协同焚烧提供理论参考。
1 研究方法 1.1 实验原料沼渣取自上海市某生态环保基地,纸板和聚乙烯通过淘宝网购。样品理化特性如表1所示,其中:
|
|
表 1 样品理化特性分析 Table 1 Fundamental properties of samples |
氯质量分数参照GB/T 30729—2014《固体生物质燃料中氯的测定方法》分析得到。氧质量分数和固定碳质量分数通过差减法计算得到。采用马弗炉550 ℃低温灰化方法获得沼渣和纸板灰样品,并利用PANalytical Axios X射线荧光光谱仪(XRF)分析灰的化学组成,结果如表2所示。实验前将3种原料于105 ℃鼓风干燥箱内烘干至恒重,并研磨筛分至60 ~ 200目后,保存于密封袋内备用。
|
|
表 2 沼渣和纸板组成 Table 2 Ash chemical composition from anaerobic digestate and cardboard |
图1为沼渣、纸板和聚乙烯燃烧实验装置,主要包括供气系统、燃烧系统以及烟气处理与检测系统。燃烧系统由管式炉和石英管组成,其中石英管两端用法兰密封,空气从石英管左端流入。烟气处理与检测系统由吸收液和电位滴定仪(ZDJ−4B)构成。烟气中HCl经去离子水吸收后由电位滴定仪测得吸收液中氯离子浓度。
|
图 1 燃烧实验系统示意图 Fig.1 Schematic diagram of combustion system |
燃烧实验前,沼渣、纸板和聚乙烯按一定的质量比混合均匀,混合样品序号为x−y−z,且x+y+z=1。例如样品0.5−0.3−0.2,代表混合样品中沼渣、纸板和聚乙烯质量分数分别为50%、30%和20%。
燃烧实验时,先将管式炉加热至目标温度(800、850、900和950 ℃),并通入空气吹扫5 min,空气流量设置为1.5 L/mL。称取0.5 g样品,均匀平铺在瓷舟内,然后将瓷舟置于石英管左侧预热15 min后,迅速推入管式炉中心恒温段进行加热,并恒温燃烧15 min。燃烧烟气先后通过2个锥形瓶,瓶内去离子水容量分别为100、50 mL,从而确保HCl被完全吸收。为防止烟气出口管路中HCl和水蒸气冷凝,通过电加热带保温管路,将保温温度设置为120 ℃。待反应结束后,将吸收液定容至200 mL,并采用浓度C为0.014 11 mmol/mL的硝酸银标准溶液进行滴定。燃烧过程中HCl排放量和Cl转化率计算式分别为
| $ \qquad {{Q}}_{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{l},{\mathrm{e}}}=\frac{\left(V-{V}_{0}\right)\times C\times {M}_{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{l}}}{m}$ | (1) |
| $ \qquad \eta =\frac{{Q}_{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{l},{\mathrm{e}}}}{\omega ({\mathrm{Cl}}_{\mathrm{d}})}\times 100\text{%} $ | (2) |
式中:
检测烟气中NOx和SO2的实验系统主要由过滤器和烟气分析仪组成,其中烟气分析仪为德国MRU公司生产的MGA 5。本节燃烧实验步骤与HCl分析过程的相似。燃烧烟气经玻璃砂芯滤球过滤和无水氧化钙脱水后进入烟气分析仪,其采样间隔设置为1 s。通过式(3)和式(4)计算NO、SO2排放量以及样品中N或S转化率[5, 12]。
| $ \qquad {Q}_{j}=\frac{{\displaystyle\int }_{0}^{t}{C}_{j,t}{V_t}{\mathrm{d}}t}{60\;000\times m} $ | (3) |
| $ \qquad {\eta }_{k}=\frac{{A}_{k}\times {Q}_{j}}{1\;000\times {M}_{j}\times {\omega }_{k}} $ | (4) |
式中:
根据气态污染物理论排放量和实际排放量之间的相对偏差,可以评价混合燃烧过程中的交互作用对气态污染物排放的影响。其中,气态污染物理论排放量计算式为
| $ \qquad {Q}_{i,{\mathrm{c}}}=x{Q}_{i,{\mathrm{AD}},{\mathrm{e}}} + y{Q}_{i,{\mathrm{CB}},{\mathrm{e}}} + {\textit z}{Q}_{i,{\mathrm{PE}},{\mathrm{e}}} $ | (5) |
式中:Qi,c为混合燃烧过程中气态污染物i理论排放量,mg/g;下标i代表HCl、NO或SO2;
通常在燃烧过程中有机氯先释放。当燃烧温度低于400 ℃时,大多数有机氯以HCl形式释放,而无机氯释放所需温度更高,一般从700 ℃开始[5, 19]。图2为燃烧温度对HCl排放量和Cl转化率的影响。沼渣中Cl含量高达4.83 mg/g,主要以可溶性的氯化物形式存在[6]。随着燃烧温度从800 ℃升至950 ℃,HCl排放量从0.20 mg/g增至0.59 mg/g。表2中显示沼渣中钙含量较高,且主要以CaCO3形式存在[20]。燃烧过程中,氯释放主要发生在250 ~ 350 ℃范围内,而CaCO3在700 ℃时开始缓慢分解。当燃烧温度超过800 ℃,石灰石固氯反应向左侧移动,一些不稳定的固氯产物开始热分解[21],导致HCl释放量增加。如表2所示,纸板中虽然钙含量较高,但灰分含量较低,固氯能力较弱。燃烧过程中纸板HCl排放规律与聚乙烯的相似。通常,纯聚乙烯不含Cl元素[22]。聚乙烯中少量氯(0.38 mg/g)可能源于生产过程的添加剂。随着燃烧温度升高,HCl排放量上升,这与含塑料废衍生燃料流化床燃烧研究结果相吻合[23]。如图2(b)所示,虽然聚乙烯Cl含量相对较低,但其转化率明显高于沼渣的。
|
图 2 燃烧温度对HCl排放量和Cl转化率的影响 Fig.2 Influence of combustion temperature on HCl emission amount and Cl conversion rate |
图3为纸板和聚乙烯质量分数对HCl排放量和Cl转化率的影响,其中:
|
图 3 纸板和聚乙烯质量分数对燃烧过程中HCl排放量和Cl转化率的影响 Fig.3 Influence of CB and PE mass fraction on HCl emission amount and Cl conversion rate in the co-combustion process |
通常燃烧过程中产生的NOx可以分为热力型、燃料型和快速型。燃烧实验最高温度为950 ℃,因此可以忽略热力型NOx[26]。另外,实验条件下快速型NOx生成量极小,因此同样可以忽略[27]。烟气分析结果表明,NO在NOx中占比大于90%。因此,后续的分析与讨论主要关注燃料型NO排放规律。图4为燃烧温度对NO排放量和N转化率的影响。较高的燃烧温度导致沼渣加热速率增加,挥发分释放过程加速,氧气消耗速度加快,从而产生局部还原性气氛,抑制了挥发性氮氧化。因此,如图4(a)所示,当燃烧温度从800 ℃升至950 ℃时,NO排放量从1.63 mg/g骤降至0.77 mg/g。在850 ℃时,纸板NO排放量最高;之后随着燃烧温度继续升高,NO排放量逐渐下降。纸板中氮主要以蛋白质和氨基酸等有机氮形式存在[28],它们在燃烧过程中极易发生热分解或氧化反应,形成NH3、HCN和CNO等含氮中间体,而这些中间体会与氧气进一步反应生成NO[29]。但随着燃烧温度升高,纸板在高温分解过程中会产生H2和CO等还原性气体,从而抑制含氮中间体氧化[30],导致NO排放量降低。如图4(b)所示,纸板燃烧过程中N转化率介于19.9% ~ 27.4%之间。聚乙烯燃烧过程中N转化率和NO排放量均较高;在800 ℃时,N转化率超过100%;之后,随着燃烧温度上升,NO排放量和N转化率均下降。燃烧温度上升导致反应速率加快,增加了氧气消耗速度,导致极易出现供氧不足的情况。此时会形成NH3和HCN等中间体,导致NO产生量减少[31]。
|
图 4 燃烧温度对NO排放量和N转化率的影响 Fig.4 Influence of combustion temperature on NO emission amount and N conversion rate |
图5为燃烧温度为850 ℃时纸板和聚乙烯质量分数对NO排放量和N转化率的影响,其中
|
图 5 纸板和聚乙烯质量分数对NO排放量和N转化率的影响 Fig.5 Influence of CB and PE mass fraction on NO emission amount and N conversion rate in the co-combustion process |
燃烧过程中SO2生成与有机硫/无机硫的氧化和硫酸盐的热分解有关[33]。通常,随着温度升高,有机硫先氧化,之后发生无机硫氧化和硫酸盐热分解[18]。图6为沼渣、纸板和聚乙烯单独燃烧过程中SO2排放量和S转化率。沼渣中硫元素主要以有机硫、硫酸盐和黄铁矿等形式存在,SO2主要来自有机硫和黄铁矿的氧化[18]。造纸工艺中常用CaCO3作为填料来提高纸制品亮度、不透明度[34]。CaCO3填料在高温作用下易分解为CaO,从而有效抑制燃烧过程中SO2释放[35]。无机Ca化合物最佳固硫温度范围为850~900 ℃[36],因为在低温时其反应活性较低,而温度升高会发生硫酸盐烧结和自分解。因此,随着燃烧温度升高,SO2排放量先下降后上升。此外,CaSO4在CaO表面沉积,抑制了CaO的脱硫作用。燃烧时,沼渣和纸板中S转化率分别为18.1% ~ 27.8%和12.3% ~ 17.8%。如图6(a)所示,聚乙烯燃烧过程中SO2排放量在7.42 ~ 8.28 mg/g范围内波动;对应地,图6(b)中S转化率在13.19% ~ 14.72%范围内小幅波动。总体而言,随着燃烧温度升高,SO2排放量略有增加。
|
图 6 燃烧温度对SO2排放量和S转化率的影响 Fig.6 Influence of combustion temperature on HCl emission amount and Cl conversion rate |
图7为纸板和聚乙烯质量分数对SO2排放量和S转化率的影响。由图7(a)可知,随着纸板质量分数上升,SO2排放量先缓慢降低;当纸板质量分数超过20%时,SO2排放量骤升。由于纸板热值较高,纸板添加量增加会促使燃烧温度上升,加快化学反应速度,强化固硫反应;但燃烧温度过高会导致SO2释放过快,其与CaO接触时间缩短,固硫反应不充分,导致SO2释放增加[37]。图7(b)为聚乙烯质量分数对混合燃烧过程中SO2排放规律的影响。随着聚乙烯质量分数增加,SO2排放量先升后降。首先,燃烧时聚乙烯的挥发分迅速释放,快速消耗氧气,形成局部缺氧气氛,导致硫不完全燃烧,形成H2S和COS等中间产物,抑制SO2排放[38]。同时,由于沼渣中碱土金属氧化物具有固硫作用[37],聚乙烯质量分数上升造成混合物中沼渣减少,弱化了固硫作用,导致SO2排放增加。当沼渣、纸板和聚乙烯质量比为6∶2∶2和7∶3∶0时,SO2排放量的实际值低于理论值,表明混合燃烧过程抑制了SO2排放。
|
图 7 纸板和聚乙烯质量分数对SO2排放量和S转化率的影响 Fig.7 Influence of CB and PE mass fraction on SO2 emission amount and S conversion rate in the co-combustion process |
沼渣与物流垃圾混合燃烧过程中气态污染物排放特性的研究结果表明,燃烧温度升高促进了HCl和SO2生成。这主要归因于过高的燃烧温度导致固氯/硫产物分解,削弱了CaO等碱土金属氧化物对酸性气体的固定作用。随着燃烧温度升高,NO排放量逐渐下降,较高的燃烧温度导致加热速率提高,促进了挥发分析出,快速消耗氧气,形成局部缺氧氛围,使N转化为NH3、HCN等中间体。
混合燃烧时,纸板和聚乙烯热值高,导致局部燃烧温度高,不利于碱土金属氧化物固氯,促进了HCl排放。当沼渣、纸板和聚乙烯质量比为7∶3∶0时,NO和SO2排放量的实际值低于理论值,说明添加聚乙烯会促进气态污染物生成,工程实践中应注意控制聚乙烯掺烧比例。
| [1] |
邹骑鸿, 余昭胜, 韦琛, 等. 厨余沼渣与城市生活垃圾混合燃烧过程的灰熔融特性[J]. 环境工程, 2023, 41(5): 69-74, 178. |
| [2] |
JIN C X, SUN S Q, YANG D H, et al. Anaerobic digestion: an alternative resource treatment option for food waste in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 779: 146397. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146397 |
| [3] |
REN Y Y, YU M, WU C F, et al. A comprehensive review on food waste anaerobic digestion: research updates and tendencies[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 247: 1069-1076. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.109 |
| [4] |
曾谦, 倪哲, 陈君, 等. 有机固废沼渣特性及其资源化探究[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(12): 61-70, 78. |
| [5] |
LU J Y, ZHANG D L, ZHANG P F, et al. Co-combustion of municipal sewage sludge and food wastes-derived anerobic digestates: combustion characteristics, HCl/NO/SO2 emission and ash behaviors[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2024, 12(5): 113588. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2024.113588 |
| [6] |
WEI C, YU Z S, ZHANG X K, et al. Co-combustion behavior of municipal solid waste and food waste anaerobic digestates: combustion performance, kinetics, optimization, and gaseous products[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(5): 106028. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2021.106028 |
| [7] |
ZHANG S, HOU H M, WANG G Z, et al. Exploring the metabolic characteristic of express packaging waste to promote the synergy of pollution and carbon reduction[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2024, 106: 107523. DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107523 |
| [8] |
HUANG S S, WANG M Y, DAI Y T, et al. Waste to treasure: upcycling waste express packing to sustainable packaging materials[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2025, 13(1): 115016. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2024.115016 |
| [9] |
DUAN H B, SONG G H, QU S, et al. Post-consumer packaging waste from express delivery in China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 144: 137-143. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.037 |
| [10] |
IANNELLO S, SEBASTIANI A, ERRIGO M, et al. The behaviour of plastic particles during pyrolysis in bubbling fluidized bed reactors: incipient agglomeration and axial segregation[J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 441: 119846. DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2024.119846 |
| [11] |
曾武清, 王予, 卜庆国, 等. 陈腐垃圾掺烧对垃圾炉焚烧特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(8): 4642-4653. |
| [12] |
YE H T, JIN Z C, LU J Y, et al. Tri-combustion of multi-source solid wastes: combustion behaviors, ash slagging characteristics, and gaseous pollutants emissions[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2025, 13(4): 117241. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2025.117241 |
| [13] |
WANG Y L, JIA L, GUO B H, et al. Investigation on the interaction mechanism during co-combustion of sewage sludge and coal slime: the effect of coal slime type and pretreatment method[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 927: 172419. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172419 |
| [14] |
GUO S, DENG X Y, LIU L D, et al. Comprehensive analysis of combustion behavior, kinetics, and gas emissions of fungus bran biofuel through torrefaction pretreatment and polypropylene addition[J]. Fuel, 2024, 364: 131014. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131014 |
| [15] |
DING Z Y, CHEN Z H, LIU J Y, et al. Co-combustion, life-cycle circularity, and artificial intelligence-based multi-objective optimization of two plastics and textile dyeing sludge[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 426: 128069. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128069 |
| [16] |
GUO S, GAO J L, ZHAO D, et al. Co-combustion of sewage sludge and Zhundong coal: effects of combustion conditions on gaseous pollutant emission and ash properties[J]. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, 54: 102836. DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102836 |
| [17] |
YANG R L, MA C, CHEN G Y, et al. Study on NOx emission during corn straw/sewage sludge co-combustion: experiments and modelling[J]. Fuel, 2021, 285: 119208. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119208 |
| [18] |
WANG X, XU J, LING P, et al. A study on the release characteristics and formation mechanism of SO2 during co-combustion of sewage sludge and coal slime[J]. Fuel, 2023, 333: 126511. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126511 |
| [19] |
FENG Z Y, ZHENG X Y, YING Z, et al. Drying of Chinese medicine residues (CMR) by hot air for potential utilization as renewable fuels: drying behaviors, effective moisture diffusivity, and pollutant emissions[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2024, 14(13): 14993-15010. DOI:10.1007/s13399-022-03722-4 |
| [20] |
FENG Y H, BU T, ZHANG Q, et al. Pyrolysis characteristics of anaerobic digestate from kitchen waste and availability of Phosphorus in pyrochar[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2022, 168: 105729. DOI:10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105729 |
| [21] |
LYU M, ZOU R J, LUO G Q, et al. Study on the pollutant emission characteristics of the co-combustion of high S/Cl waste mixed with recycled papermaking waste[J]. Fuel, 2024, 358: 130355. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130355 |
| [22] |
PINTO F, LOPES H, ANDRÉ R N, et al. Effect of catalysts in the quality of syngas and by-products obtained by co-gasification of coal and wastes. 2: heavy metals, sulphur and halogen compounds abatement[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87(7): 1050-1062. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.06.014 |
| [23] |
LI Y J, WANG H H, JIANG L, et al. HCl and PCDD/Fs emission characteristics from incineration of source-classified combustible solid waste in fluidized bed[J]. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(83): 67866-67873. DOI:10.1039/C5RA08722H |
| [24] |
CHEN L M, LIAO Y F, XIA Y Q, et al. Combustion characteristics of co-combusted municipal solid wastes and sewage sludge[J]. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2024, 46(1): 5730-5742. DOI:10.1080/15567036.2020.1739175 |
| [25] |
COLAPICCHIONI V, MOSCA S, GUERRIERO E, et al. Environmental impact of co-combustion of polyethylene wastes in a rice husks fueled plant: evaluation of organic micropollutants and PM emissions[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 716: 135354. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135354 |
| [26] |
RONG H, WANG T, ZHOU M, et al. Combustion characteristics and slagging during co-combustion of rice husk and sewage sludge blends[J]. Energies, 2017, 10(4): 438. DOI:10.3390/en10040438 |
| [27] |
TOMAS DA ROCHA L, KIM H, LEE C, et al. Mechanism of NOx formation from nitrogen in the combustion of the coals used in sintering process[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2020, 51(5): 2068-2078. DOI:10.1007/s11663-020-01923-8 |
| [28] |
ULUSOY B, ANICIC B, LIN W G, et al. Interactions in NOx chemistry during fluidized bed co-combustion of residual biomass and sewage sludge[J]. Fuel, 2021, 294: 120431. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120431 |
| [29] |
HANSSON K. Pyrolysis of poly-L-leucine under combustion-like conditions[J]. Fuel, 2003, 82(6): 653-660. DOI:10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00357-5 |
| [30] |
HUANG J G, ZHANG J Z, CHEN T J, et al. Oxy-fuel co-combustion properties and N-containing pollutants release characteristics of biomass/coal blends[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2024, 117: 101800. DOI:10.1016/j.joei.2024.101800 |
| [31] |
YANG Z Z, ZHANG Y Y, LIU L L, et al. Environmental investigation on co-combustion of sewage sludge and coal gangue: SO2, NOx and trace elements emissions[J]. Waste Management, 2016, 50: 213-221. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.011 |
| [32] |
WANG T, HOU H B, YE Y, et al. Combustion behavior of refuse-derived fuel produced from sewage sludge and rice husk/wood sawdust using thermogravimetric and mass spectrometric analyses[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 222: 1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.016 |
| [33] |
WANG Y L, YE L, CHEN Y, et al. Sulfur migration and conversion during co-combustion of sewage sludge and coal slime[J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 237: 121646. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121646 |
| [34] |
MAŚLANA K, SIELICKI K, WENELSKA K, et al. Facile strategy for boosting of inorganic fillers retention in paper[J]. Polymers, 2023, 16(1): 110. DOI:10.3390/polym16010110 |
| [35] |
LIU J Y, ZENG J J, SUN S Y, et al. Combined effects of FeCl3 and CaO conditioning on SO2, HCl and heavy metals emissions during the DDSS incineration[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 299: 449-458. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.132 |
| [36] |
王彦霖. 城市污泥和煤泥的混合燃烧行为及其交互机理研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2023.
|
| [37] |
WANG Y L, JIA L, GUO B H, et al. Investigation of interaction mechanisms during co-combustion of sewage sludge and coal slime: combustion characteristics and NO/SO2 emission behavior[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 851(Pt 1): 158166.
|
| [38] |
CHEN J C, HE Y, LIU J Y, et al. The mixture of sewage sludge and biomass waste as solid biofuels: process characteristic and environmental implication[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 139: 707-717. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.119 |
2025, Vol. 41
